Sugar is such a controversial topic at the instant .
You have those that plan to ban all sugars and stick with a diet of mainly protein and fat.
You have others who include many natural sugars in their diets but don’t touch anything that has sugar .
And finally, there are those that say that each one sugars have an equivalent effect on your body, no matter the source, so you would possibly also eat what you favor .
If you’re confused, here’s the important truth on natural sugar vs sugar .
What is sugar?
Table sugar, the white sugar that's most ordinarily used, is named sucrose.
It is made from a molecule of fructose (fruit sugar) and a molecule of glucose. it's naturally found in green plants, but is additionally added to tons of processed foods.
Sucrose may be a disaccharide that has got to be weakened before it's absorbed. Glucose and fructose are both monosaccharides which will be absorbed directly .
Fructose, glucose, and sucrose all contain 4 calories per gram. Fructose has the very best sweetening power, followed by sucrose then glucose.
Natural sugar vs sugar
Basically, all of those sugars occur naturally in several foods. However, you'll also find them added to processed foods.
In order to try to to this, sucrose is usually extracted from sugar canes or sugar beets, and added to the food. you'll also find high-fructose syrup , which is extracted from corn starch.
The composition of natural sugar vs added sugar is really very similar: it’s just a mixture of glucose and fructose. However, that doesn’t mean that the effect they need on your body is that the same.
The absorption and effects of various sugars.
First, let’s check out how sugar is metabolized.
Glucose is absorbed directly by your intestine and goes into your bloodstream then your cells. It raises your blood glucose pretty quickly. Fructose is additionally absorbed by your intestine , but before getting used by your cells, it must be converted into glucose by your liver . It raises your blood glucose levels more gradually, without stimulating the secretion of insulin.
Sucrose is weakened into glucose and fructose in your intestine before being absorbed as described above.
Numerous studies have shown the damaging effects fructose could wear your body.
Fructose is linked to increasing rates of obesity, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance, nonalcoholic liver disease diseasr.
These effects generally happen to a lesser extent with glucose consumption rather than fructose.
As mentioned previously, fructose doesn't stimulate insulin secretion, and insulin regulates leptin, which is that the hormone that signals fullness. Less insulin means less leptin which suggests more chances of still feeling hungry after eating.
In time, eating fructose over glucose could lead on to weight gain.
And guess what: this all happens just about an equivalent way whether you’re ingesting natural fructose or sugar from a cupcake. Your body can’t tell the difference.
So does this mean that each one sugars are bad for you which you ought to limit your fruit intake?
Well, NO.
As usual, things aren’t as simple.
Why fructose is best than sugar .
Even if the fructose in fruit is that the same molecule because the fructose in high fructose syrup , their effects are radically different.
While industrial fructose may be a risk factor for metabolic alterations, that's not the case for fruit fructose.
In fact, multiple studies have shown that folks who eat more fruit and vegetables have greater health benefits and lower risks of diseases.
Eating fruit and vegetables is related to a reduced rate of coronary heart condition , a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, a discount in strokes. a reduced risk of cancer, and may improve your psychological well-being.
Looking specifically at fruit, studies in patients with type-2 diabetes have shown that restricting it doesn’t have any incidence on the patients’ weight or waist circumference.
This is interesting because some health professionals believe that type 2 diabetic patients should restrict their fruit intake for better glycemic control.
In addition, a review of studies showed that fresh fruit consumption didn't contribute to excess energy intake, adiposity, and obesity, and will even reduce them.
This study also showed that higher fresh fruit consumption was related to lower risks of diabetes. For people with diabetes, it had been related to lower risks of death and development of major complications.
This could be surprising because the energy content of fruit primarily comes from simple sugars. this is often actually a paradox: fruit contains tons of sugar, yet has anti-obesity effects.
If you’re wondering if it’s possible to eat an excessive amount of fruit, a couple of studies, have put this to the test. People ate 20 servings of fruit each day for a couple of weeks or months, and reported no adverse effects.
Of course, I don’t necessarily recommend eating this much fruit: I just want to stress how different the consequences of sugars are in fruit and in refined foods.
The mechanisms aren’t entirely understood, but here are a couple of reasons why this might be.
First of all, fruit contains many healthy nutrients (antioxidants, vitamins, phytochemicals, fiber…) that aren’t present in processed sugar.
Fiber helps hamper the absorption rate of sugar, preventing blood glucose spikes. It also slows down general food digestion and fills up space in your stomach, which keeps you fuller for extended .
This is why eating an orange will fill you up far more than drinking its juice.
In addition, it’s pretty difficult to urge an excessive amount of fructose from fruit. The natural water, fiber, and time it takes to truly eat the fruit will automatically encourage you to manage your portions.
You would got to eat two medium-sized apples so as to urge an equivalent sugar content as a can of coke. likelihood is that you'd still be ready to eat your regular meal after the soda, while it'd be harder to try to to so after the 2 apples.
And apples are pretty carb-heavy fruits— imagine eating over 400 raspberries to urge that very same amount of sugar!
(But albeit you were ready to eat the maximum amount sugar from fruit because the sugar found in say 4 cans of soda, it might still be such a lot better for you!)
What about natural sugar in processed foods?
This question also sparks controversy. If you were to shop for fresh fruit crush or a smoothie, likelihood is that the label would read something like “contains no added sugars: only the natural sugars of the fruit”.
So does this mean that the sugar in there's good or bad?
Well, albeit the fructose in fruit is healthy, that's because it comes within the actual fruit which has all of the properties listed above.
In addition, you'd need to consume around 4 oranges to urge the sugar found in one glass of fruit juice . likelihood is that you wouldn’t eat that many: it might take too long and fill you up tons .
Now compare that to the few seconds it takes to drink a glass of fruit juice , and even have a second and third one…
Are natural sweeteners better than sugar?
People are increasingly beginning to address natural sweeteners rather than processed sugar: but are they really better?
Typically, they're less refined than table sugar and contain certain nutrients. However, you'd got to consume them in pretty big quantities to truly enjoy these nutrients.
It is interesting to notice that some natural sweeteners have (slightly) lower glycemic indexes than table sugar, which won’t raise your blood glucose the maximum amount . this is often the case for agave, coconut sugar, and syrup .
Some natural sweeteners offer certain health benefits, like honey and syrup .
Stevia also raises some questions. it's a natural sweetener that's calorie-free, a bit like artificial sweeteners. it's refined, however, and much from its natural form.
It has been shown to be a secure sweetening agent, and should even have other benefits like antibacterial and anti inflammatory properties. However, some concerns about its impact on fertility are raised.
In the end, these sweeteners are still sugar (with the exception of stevia). While using a number of them to exchange table sugar could also be beneficial, this shouldn’t be a free pass to dump plenty in your food.
For instance, once I sweeten my food with coconut sugar, I find myself using far more of it to urge an equivalent satisfaction I usually get from table sugar. This totally defeats the purpose!
Processed sugar vs natural sugar briefly
Both natural sugars and refined sugars are made from an equivalent molecules: (fructose and/or glucose), and your body can’t really tell the difference. However, their impact is drastically different.
While the fructose in high fructose syrup is linked with many disease risk factors, the one in fruit is related to tons of health benefits. As for natural sweeteners, they need certain positive properties but shouldn’t be seen as health foods to be consumed immoderately .
I also want to reiterate that sugar isn't poison/toxic/your enemy, as tons of individuals think. As long as you eat healthy and balanced meals with many variety, eating sugar— yes, even refined sugar— is completely fine. Remember that demonizing certain foods isn't the solution .
Comments
Post a Comment